Scientist and Tourist travel to remote natural environments, such as South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Discovering isolated areas is remained as a source of major controversy. In my opinion, I uphold the standpoint that this trend has more disadvantages than the advantages.
On the one hand, there is an undeniable truth that it is beneficial for scientists as well as tourists to take expedition to remote natural zones. In term of science, since scientists discover an unexplored place, they can grasp a more profound knowledge into this new obscure area in the earth. As a result, their data collection would create favorable conditions for their science-related projects with a view to protecting the earth from environmental problem, such as ice melting or erosion. From tourists’ perspective, no sooner do travelers visit a new uncommon destination than they could get new valuable experiences. For example, tourist can contemplate a vast breath-taking landscape in South Pole such as aurora phenomenon, which is impossible to be seen in other places.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that exploring remote natural environments is more detrimental than its benefits. First, it is dangerous for travelers’ life to take expedition to these places due to the lack of knowledge and specific equipment. To be more details, some threats such as danger wild animals, unknown naturals disasters could be hazardous to the survival of scientist and tourists. Second, the disappearance of unique specifies in these regions could be inevitable in the light of large-scale exploiting operation. To be more specific, some rare wild animals such as red wolf, golden tiger or polar bear would be confronted with the extinction, if people evade habitats of these animals and chase them for own purpose.
In conclusion, although it is accepted that traveling to remote natural areas are beneficial for tourist and scientists for some reasons, I would support the view that the disadvantages caused by this issued outweigh the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29773462783 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15262517032 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5423075143 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220326956339 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721225754118 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643146326766 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131901709026 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759020641887 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.