Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Not only once had I learned about the increase in the rate of crime when I turned on TV or flicked through the pages of a newspaper. Whether crime is a result of social issues and poverty or that from bad person's nature. Some people believe that the former point of view is correct, while others support the latter. In this essay, I look at both side and mention my opinion.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people approve of the view claim that the bad person's nature cause criminals climb. Firstly, cruel people have a trend to bully others at school when they were only children. As a result, if they are not punished by their parent or school, it is possible that they become violent criminals later in life. Secondly, lazy and greedy people commit crime to get what they want without working hard. For example, instead of making an honest money, they turn into thief and steal money from others.
On the other hand, it seems that social issues and poverty are the main causes behind crime. There are many social problems that people fall into poverty. For instance, they cannot make ends meet because of unemployment. Consequently, people have to restore to crime in order to earn the living. However, many people who live in wealthy condition, still break the law.
The most obvious answer is for them to expose evil societies such as drug trafficking or gambling.
All thing considered, it is obvious that there are conflicting views on the topic. It is a belief of many that rates of crime increase due to poverty and social problems, whereas they are also those who think crime is a result of person's mental attitude. It is my firm conviction that first argument is stronger. However, the situation can be changed in different views
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ial issues and poverty or that from bad persons nature. Some people believe that the fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... approve of the view claim that the bad persons nature cause criminals climb. Firstly, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69677419355 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29091314512 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583870967742 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6592840472 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6315789474 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73684210526 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347277587143 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920840490928 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875733250951 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170509457422 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105630474652 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.