Some people believe that who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than who prefer to watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that reading books helps people nurturing imagination and developing language skills rather than watching TV. While it may suit with many people, I believe that reading books and watching TV play an equally important role in broadening the knowledge.
On the one hand, the option to reading books to enlarging the knowledge is advantageous to some extents. Firstly, valuable books have a lot of laudable knowledge such as references as well as books that come highly recommend and success stories. It is the reason why reading books play an important role in expanding the imagination. Secondly, the language which is used in books is carefully chosen which allows people can learn the way that authors expressed their ideas as well as they way they used words.
On the other hand, I believe that watching TV is a great method to draw inspiration and develop language skills. Interesting programs on TV can help people to push their imagination and easily access a world of knowledge. For example, TV advertisements which have lively animation and interesting songs allow children to expand their imagination. Some language training programs which are shown on the TV help people can develop their language skills without paying fees. There is evidence to support the idea that people can develop their language skill through watching some TV programs about language.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that reading books is essential to help people nurture imagination as well as develop language skills, this is by no means that watching TV plays an important role.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13127413127 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69232425416 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501930501931 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7106415653 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35010195101 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152682617717 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961491479435 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23386749667 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708844900385 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.