Some people believe that the world should use only one language.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the world develops, the demand for a united language is increasing dramatically. Some people argue that human should speak only one language, but others prefer the myriad dialects. While I accept that one language is beneficial to some extent, I must admit that having a variety of languages is also inevitable.
On one hand, the usage of a sole language benefits not only global economy but also education. Firstly, were it not for the various vernaculars, the world would be homogenized. Therefore, economic activities such as free trade, free labor and the free flow of capital investment, which supply employment for many people, will be boosted. For instance, by using English, which is the most prevalent language in the world, workers in Asian nations are able to be employed by big companies such as Microsoft, Google, and Facebook .Secondly, the ubiquity of one language will globally diminish the constraint of communication and language barrier. Thus, students who come from continents such as Asia and Africa can have access to the prestigious universities in America and Europe without taking the standardized examination.
On the other hand, the multi-languages world must be maintained in order to protect the cultural identity of each ethnic community. Traditional customs are said to have a strong connection with regional vernacular. For example, each Chinese word, which acts as a distinct symbol, greatly connects to the national history and culture. .In addition, if the indigenous language were deteriorated, cultural diversity will be in danger.Because of the dearth of conservation of the minor languages, the endemic culture of the ethnic minority living in the deep forest in Brazil is now propelled to the verge of extinction.
In conclusion, even though the commonly spoken language may alleviate the obstacle in using language and make it easier for the economy,the prevalence of languages must be sustained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... such as Microsoft, Google, and Facebook .Secondly, the ubiquity of one language w...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...uch as Microsoft, Google, and Facebook .Secondly, the ubiquity of one language will glob...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ts to the national history and culture. .In addition, if the indigenous language ...
^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...s to the national history and culture. .In addition, if the indigenous language we...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Because
...d, cultural diversity will be in danger.Because of the dearth of conservation of the mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...guage and make it easier for the economy,the prevalence of languages must be sustain...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35179153094 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00812171856 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5499948628 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122439441678 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051415155669 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702507219858 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086219799948 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891092718282 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.