Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
Waste is one of the most substantial sections of human beings in the temporary world. Some people think that there is not enough household waste to be recycled, and the main responsibility is for governments to introduce laws on recycling. While I think, to a certain, extent governments should enforce recycling laws on households, I also believe that education about recycling is more important.
First of all, it is widely accepted that creating laws to deal with environmental issues is the best way forward. If laws about recycling were passed, it would force people to think carefully before throwing things out with the garbage. Also, heavy fines should be levied onto people who try to break the laws. If everyone knew about the fines of not recycling things, they would make sure that all recyclables are put in correct bins. For example, Singapore has introduced laws asking people to recycle their household waste, including extremely heavy fines. The laws has brought an unpredictable result with 60% of waste has been reduced every year. Clearly, this enforecement of laws would definitely increase recycling.
Secondly, education is seen as a long-term solution to increase recycling. Environmental and waste problems should be brought into classes, so that students can gain more knowledge about this issue. In addition, authorities should produce some TV shows or run campaigns to show people how to recycle waste. Take Singapore as an example. Thanks to an effective combination between law and education, recycling has become a daily activity of every citizen, which is voluntarily done without any complaints.
On the other hand, there are some people argue that the enforcement of laws may cause people to resent them and react by sticking even more firmly with their ways of disposing of waste. However, most individuals seem to do nothing unless they are required to. Therefore, if governments hope to make recycling household waste a common task throughout the country, they need to put laws into force.
To sum up, both laws and education are necessary to encourage householders to recycling. While laws are enforcement, education can turn them into a public willingness. Personally, i believe that there would be more and more household waste recycled if governments can efficiently harness both laws and education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...cluding extremely heavy fines. The laws has brought an unpredictable result with 60...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would definitely increase recycling. Secondly, education is seen as a long-te...
^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... into a public willingness. Personally, i believe that there would be more and mo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2579787234 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84228637547 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8394388073 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36646861798 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100826095447 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769930835074 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215180522214 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792880773508 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.