Some people believe that escalating the proportion of sports facilities can play significant roles to enhance public health whereas others insist that this type of method are less likely to exert marked positive impacts. So, they feel that other important steps ought to be taken. This essay will discuss both sides with relevant examples and reach a conclusion.
On the one hand, proponents of sports provisions claim that providing the facilities opens up excellent opportunities for all levels of public such as youngsters, adults and older generations to boost their health systems. Since spor...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Essay evaluation report
this type of method are less likely
this type of method is less likely
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 339 350
No. of Characters: 1862 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.291 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.493 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.653 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.153 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.529 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61946902655 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72124493368 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684365781711 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4442745089 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.071428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226898697681 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068636208536 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509323337184 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134975388425 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291500357477 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.