Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Not only once had I learned about the cost of alleviating environmental problems when I turned on TV or flicked through the pages of a newspaper over the past few months. Whether preservation of wild animals and birds gives too much attention and too many resources. I completely disagree with the point of view. In this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.
On the one hand, protecting wild animal and birds exerts an influence on the biological diversity. Nowadays, many species in the world are liable to extinct because their habitat is destroyed by company's activities such as discharging chemical wastes into rivers or depleting natural resources. Therefore, it is possible that the ecological crisis is caused. Authorities have to pay the cost in order to preserve wild animals and birds.
On the other hand, preservation of wild animals and birds play important role in developing economies. Firstly, biological diversity can attract tourists from other countries. By doing this, government will earn more income from tourism.
Secondly, if birds are not protected, agriculture can be affected. For example, when the number of birds which eat insects decreases, the number of insects will increase and decline productivity of agriculture.
All thing considered, although it may be the belief of many that wild animals and birds are drawing/attracting too much concern and too many resources of society, I can not agree. However, the situation can be different context and people should not take the position that is extreme.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9423881938 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4982675902 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283331664096 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791204433034 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963793805352 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133385370715 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916978031442 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.