There is a contentious debate surrounding the issue of the university students filed throughout the globe in these days. Some people assert that students should be free to make decision regarding the subjects that they want to study at the university. On the other flip side, others hold the different view. They claim that it would be wise if students would be constrained pursuing the majors that will be more practical in the foreseeable future. To me, the idea of former party seems more appealing. In this essay I am going to delve both points of views.
On the one hand, it is widely announced by psychologists that students should be allowed to follow their interest regardless of any limitation. Not only would it contribute to spread of the literacy among people, but i would readily result in more being progressive and productive in the communities. For example, according to the recent survey of the X University, fifty percent of the females were more enthusiastic studying in universities during last decade. They subsequently claimed that it is because of dismissing restrictions on choosing their fields.
On the other hand, in favor of latter group, people are somehow confined to study a predetermined range of the subjects. Accordingly, students should cautiously take steps in accordance with the things that would be useful in the future such as science and new technology. Although it is instinctively manifest that some specific branches of the study inevitably could acquire a satisfactory boost, the other ones could easily be neglected. For instance, this is why X nations in this era should search for international elites adept in the engineering fields handle their projects. So, it would not only hinder nations to be sophisticated in one subject, but lead to existence of countries needy of other nations.
To sum up, it would be mandatory for government as long as they let their youth free make their decision with respect to their beloved pursuit no matter no matter what subject it is. It is hoped that by following this policy nations will be adequately prominent in all aspect of the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pread of the literacy among people, but i would readily result in more being prog...
^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'no matter'.
Suggestion: no matter
...n with respect to their beloved pursuit no matter no matter what subject it is. It is hoped that by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07344632768 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85605374517 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573446327684 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8071266597 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376691018055 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105268940218 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836875326903 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217040340667 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828089292003 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.