Some people think that the government has the duty to ensure its citizens have a healthy diet, while others argue it is the responsibility of each individual. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decades the responsibility of health assurance has been attracting a great deal of public attention due to its substantial impacts on humankind’s development. Although the proposal of governments’ exclusive liability sounds reasonable, both governments and health should be responsible for maintaining a healthy diet.
On the one hand, it is true that governments should have the duty to ensure a healthy diet for the citizens. The legislation of stricter food regulations should be enacted by official authorities to stop the circulation of unhealthy products in markets. This will act as a deterrent for the food producers from failing to meet the manufacturing standards as they will take the heavy punishment into considerations. In fact, Many Vietnamese individuals are susceptible to diabetes and cancers due to their consumption of food contaminated with carcinogenic coloring, which could only be tackled by stricter food scrutiny from governments.
On the other hand, it is highly-recommended that citizens should be liable for their health assurance themselves. The overconsumption of processed products and convenience food would feed into the possibilities of being more sensitive to cardiovascular diseases in individuals. This means that dietary plans without red meat and abounds in organic vegetables would lead to the betterment of their physical health especially in the blood circulation and metabolism. This is because plants’ richness in fiber reduces the excessive accumulation of fat content, which exclusively harms the body’s organs.
In conclusion, it is citizens’ liability to guarantee the stability of their health state due to their overconsumption of contaminated food. Additionally, governments should prohibit any practices of manufacturing any harmful food products to gratify the citizens’ demand for healthy dietary plans.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92028985507 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63721920965 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1861839461 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.166666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116179037704 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507361814393 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712374869172 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778710536617 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437985863669 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.