some people think that government should impose strict control of the usage of water. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Water has become more and more scarcer due to the global warming and serious pollution. Some people believe that government should supervise the amount of water providing for citizens while others claim that it is not necessary. I partly agree with the control the usage of water.
On the one hand, there are numerous tangible advantages associated with governmental control of water. Firstly, were it not for this action, water could be used excessively and squandered, followed by dire shortage of water in long run. Surveys have shown that than around 90% of water in the world is saline, but the small percentage is available to such a growing amount of population with up to 7 billion people. For that reason, equal distribution between citizens under the supervision makes sense for many sides from developing to developed countries. secondly, the quality of water is another matter of concern. in addition, Governments are predominantly responsible for purifying water to ensure that all citizens steer clear of diseases and unwanted troubles. Some individuals, as well, misuse water and cause such a huge waste, affecting the development of entire community.
On the other hand, it cannot be refuted that the intervention is seen as troublesome. Since governments are bound up in an ensemble of duties from economy to education, they will be soon overburdened and can hardly exercise effective control over the matter of water. Take Vietnam as an example of a nation where people in some regions are given good water quality while others suffer contaminated source of drink. Besides, the usage of water is the right of each person and contingent on personal need. Several groups may entail a huge amount of water to run their industries, but others are in need of a small level for household purposes. As a result, the imposition of government on the fair distribution proves unreasonable.
My idea is that both government and citizens are equitably accountable for the matter of water. Governments take charge of limiting wrong purposes of water usage and set the standard price for water as a service among community. Meanwhile, citizens have the right to use as much water as possible as long as they pay enough finance for the authority and prove that their exploitation is mutually beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'scarcer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: scarcer
Water has become more and more scarcer due to the global warming and serious p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...from developing to developed countries. secondly, the quality of water is another matter...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... of water is another matter of concern. in addition, Governments are predominantly...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the development of entire community. On the other hand, it cannot be refuted ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r distribution proves unreasonable. My idea is that both government and citi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11609498681 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8189077629 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554089709763 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8151210431 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.052631579 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226527160871 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809414859861 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724732180057 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160825739137 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603758326918 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.