In is a constant discussion about whether at least one parent of young children should scarify his or her job to take care of their kid, and in return, the government will then provide adequate support to that person. In this essay, I will provide discussions on both sides about this policy.
On the one hand, it is often argued that the mental status and the educational level of children is often influenced by the close relationship, especially parent. In other words, children development can be maximised, when kids have received enough love and care from their parents. In contrast, young teenagers who did not receive adequate attention from their parents can experience a lack of emotion or even worse, depression. For instance, my uncle and aunt went aboard occasionally due to their jobs and eventually, could not pay much attention to their child; then, later on, they have discovered that my cousin was suffering from depression.
On the other hand, asking a parent to stay at home can be a disadvantage for them from looking for a new job afterwards. To illustrate this point, staying at home for several years to look after their children can impact on their capability, skills and knowledge on their specific firm. Eventually, they may fall behind others when applying for a new position. Furthermore, the large expenditure of this policy will impact greatly on the government finance, and some believe that these funds could produce more benefits if using for other policies.
In conclusion, while there are various advantages to paying a parent who needs to stay at home to take care of their children, such as positive emotion of young children; this policy can also cause these parents to lose their chance of getting a good job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their chance of getting a good job.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, may, so, then, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97288135593 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65483682646 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583050847458 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2346030351 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328412816054 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121305526139 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861738391823 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207688959155 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622951548334 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.