Over the pass few years more and more people think that government should pay one parents of every young children to stay at home to look after their children.
In my opinion I think there are pros and cons associated with this policy. This essay will discuss the pros and cons associated with paying one parents to look after their young children.
Today, the rate of children been deliver to each family is alarming making it difficult for parent to cope with the financial bonding to care for young children. In addition, many household today have more than three young children that needs to be care for financially, physically and materially. Because of high standard of living both parents with young children will be force to work in other to better care for their family.
Meanwhile, living young children in the hands of inadequate careers, with limited working experience on how to better care for young children. In my opinion government should take responsibilities of paying one of the parents of young children to stay at home to care for their young children. Because this will promote quality care for the children, good discipline, proper nutrition that promote healthy living and development.
Although, government should be meticulous about paying those with young children. Furthermore, government should set a period of payment and end of payment. In order to encourage working parent to return to work. For instance do you think that a parent who get paid by the government for looking after is own children be interested in going back to work? Definitely, they will not be willy to return back to work. What's more, this payment will promote laziness, that will lead to heath related issues as a result of sitting at home and immobility thereby causing obesity, diabetes, depression and high blood pressure.
In conclusion, parent with young children should be pay by the government for some period of time to look after their young children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'delivered'.
Suggestion: delivered
...ren. Today, the rate of children been deliver to each family is alarming making it di...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng both parents with young children will be force to work in other to better care...
^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other to better care for their family. Meanwhile, living young children in the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...promote healthy living and development. Although, government should be meticulous about ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...? Definitely, they will not be willy to return back to work. Whats more, this payment will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ll not be willy to return back to work. Whats more, this payment will promote lazines...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 85, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hould be pay by the government for some period of time to look after their young children.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00609756098 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58619981947 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47256097561 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7169632187 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47093425451 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184554362881 0.084324248473 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141222530096 0.0667982634062 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312833837796 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105355063809 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.