Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
A section of society claim that rather than preventing climate change we should find some alternative to live with it. However, I disagree with this statement although, climate change is mammoth problem faced by the whole world but, still it can be solved with the help of the governments and individuals itself.
To commence with, there are many measures which can tackle the problem of climate change. First and foremost, global warming is happening owing to the increase in the emission of carbon dioxide. Therefore, it is moral duty of higher authorities to impose high taxes on the industries and vehicles used by masses which caused vast amount of fumes and finally leads to climate change. Moreover, these taxes will reduce the much industrialisation and the uses of more private vehicles. For example, in India has a rule of green taxes imposed by the prime minister. Being bind in this law much population rely on the public transportation and car pooling system. Apart from it, large number of trees should be grown and also governments should ban the deforestation. In addition, folks should stop using plastic bags.
The argument that instead of preventing climate change we need to explore alternative to live with it. As it is seen as natural phenomenon that occurs naturally. Human use resources for fulfill their needs. For example, people use ac, air conditions which prevent them from the heat. Moreover, in this industrialisation era no one have curiosity towards prevent climate change they are escaping from it by using technology. Therefore, they think that it is better to live with it by using alternative ways.
In conclusion, it is clear from the above discussion that though, there are some alternative are present to live with climate change. However, I think that for the long term solution to save our planet from climate change us the fundamental duty of governments and people. As it can be prevented by growing trees and with the reduction on the carbon dioxide emissions things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 82, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'alternatives'?
Suggestion: alternatives
... discussion that though, there are some alternative are present to live with climate change...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, moreover, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07185628743 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75218596601 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553892215569 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1455838033 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1578947368 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256068846768 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788020318838 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988366250531 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169359771369 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623807685615 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.