Some people think it is acceptable to use animal for the benefits of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
For thousands of years, animals and human beings have established with each other a complicated and magic relationship. While some people deem that human should not exploit animals and invade animal rights for selfish purposes, I believe it is necessary for human beings to utilize animals properly and it is impossible to completely cut down human’s dependence on animals.
People argue that it is wrong to utilize animals for reasons. There is no doubt that human’s overexploitation of animals is harmful to both sides. We can see this when endangered species are dying away for earth due to excessive hunting. Furthermore, it is morally wrong to kill wild animals for entertainment and profits. This is because humans are not given the right to disrespect any other lives on earth.
However, a strong argument can also be made from the opposite position. One significant counter-argument is that it is the rule of nature for senior species to make use of the junior species. Therefore, it is natural for people to kill animals for food, research and other purposes. In another respect, animals indeed have contributed a lot to human development. One great contribution they made lies in the development of medicine - people test new drugs on animals, thus ensuring its safety and effectiveness. This means that the rapid social development is closely connected to the contributions from animals.
In summary, although hunting wild animals and killing them for fun or for their expensive furs are cruel and unnecessary, there still exist certain necessity and rationality for human beings to use animals. Anyway, human’s survival and development closely rely on animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e animals for reasons. There is no doubt that human’s overexploitation of animals...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'anyway', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'in summary', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246621621622 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.152027027027 0.155533422707 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121621621622 0.0946595960268 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0540540540541 0.0501214627716 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0405405405405 0.0437548338989 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118243243243 0.122226691241 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0337837837838 0.0403226058552 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95420929146 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0405405405405 0.0326793684256 124% => OK
Particles: 0.00337837837838 0.00163938923432 206% => OK
Determiners: 0.0641891891892 0.0861772015684 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0101351351351 0.021408717616 47% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00337837837838 0.011925033212 28% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1685.0 1933.35771543 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 316.048096192 85% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24074074074 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388888888889 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307407407407 0.28420135186 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207407407407 0.203846283523 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.137316102897 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95420929146 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.037074148 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.56093040696 104% => OK
Word variations: 61.2499550745 60.7387585426 101% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.7743622355 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4406966646 49.517814964 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 127.492653851 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7743622355 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.866666666667 0.814263465372 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 48.7407407407 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.61643835616 1.69124875643 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512730112328 0.332605444948 154% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108445600311 0.102741220458 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0816882078559 0.0668466124924 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.540882470193 0.534860350844 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160561634616 0.148594505496 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204398438198 0.134430193775 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121994628644 0.0742795772207 164% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.348334254084 0.324371583561 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0739482560024 0.0638462369009 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348683040396 0.228012699653 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836836440956 0.058150111329 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.