Some people think that technology has made our life too complex. However, other people think that it has made our life easier. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are different perspectives about the development of technologies. While some people believe that technologies have improved people living standards, other people claim that it has caused the complexity in society. Even though there are drawbacks of technologies, I believe that, technologies have created better lifestyles for people than caused the detrimental effects to people.
On the one hand, some people said that, technology has made our lives too complicated, because without learning to use of technologies, it would be difficult to survive. For example, booking for a seat in a cinema, coach or taxi is no longer completed over the telephones, but just a touch or click away. Therefore, people have to frequently update and learn to use those technologies and this can create the difficulties.
On the other hand, technology has created people’s life easier because it improves the quality of people’s lifestyles. For instance, Tesla introduced driverless cars, so that people would not need to be stressed over traffic jams during commute. Furthermore, the improvement of payment methods, which use embedded sim cards in a phone, enhances the shopping or purchasing easier. Hence, it cannot deny that the technologies have improved the quality of living standards.
The fact that, the invention of newer technologies improves people’s living standards worth more than the irritation causing by the complexity use of those devices. The technologies can enable people to complete the work at a faster rate, so people can enjoy their leisure activities, which were impossible to imagine in the past centuries. By 21st century, the average working hours were 40 hours a week compared to 78 hours a week in 1950s. Therefore, this reduction of hours acquired by technological development and people can enjoy their lives during those hours.
In conclusion, people have different views about the usefulness of technologies in people’s lifestyles and in my perspective; it brought more benefits than drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1950s'.
Suggestion: in the 1950s
...ours a week compared to 78 hours a week in 1950s. Therefore, this reduction of hours acq...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49841269841 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11697859402 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7119954849 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252341691353 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878135663015 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791140928847 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146475400858 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023432034834 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.