Education providers, students and parents widely argue on which method of studying is better, studying in small groups also known as "group study" or studying alone or as I call it going solo. Each of these has its own pros and cons.
Studying in groups, especially, groups formed of student from diverse backgrounds allows the group participants to learn how to work in teams. It develops the abilities of leadership, teamwork, good listening, reasoning, accepting difference of opinion and enables students to appreciate the importance of interdependence. However, there needs to be a disciplined approach to group study with clear definition of objective from the beginning. A more thought through method enables focus and goal orientation, otherwise the whole objective of "group study" may be lost and as happens more often the students tend to have fun discussing everything other than study.
Studying alone allows students to concentrate on their studies alone and encourages self-planning. Students are able to develop their skills such as research, self-discipline, hard work. They are able to measure the impact of their hard work on the results and hence the method encourages self-assessment among them. This in return helps them to know which areas need improvement on and promotes self-confidence among them. Due to less peer pressure and criticism, which is often present in group study, students only need to put in all their efforts in studies and hence may achieve better results as compared to group studies.
Both ways of studying have their advantages and disadvantages and it is more about personal choice and comfort of the student. With the end objective of studying and scoring good grades in mind, a student and his mentors should be able of analyse which method is most suitable for them given their personality types. A student who is easily distracted from studies due to the presence of others may prefer studying alone. On the other hand a student more comfortable in knowing others' point of view and learns from its peers may be more suitable for a group study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach of these has its own pros and cons. Studying in groups, especially, groups f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r results as compared to group studies. Both ways of studying have their advanta...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16184971098 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78149424126 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534682080925 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.207834714 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.066666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370440979763 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128810865657 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07494268799 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243135256702 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067547555606 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.