technology
It is true that many technological achievements have revolutionized our daily interactions. These gain has also influenced the way people make relationships, and from my own view, there are both benefits and drawbacks.
To begin with, technology has changed significantly people’s interaction. In the past, people used to communicate and establish friendships through face-to-face communicating or maybe by letter and pigeon over a long distance. But now, people tend to use the benefits of technology to communicate in daily life, from telephone to some kinds of internet-based applications such as Facebook or Skype.
On the one hand, such technological development is highly beneficial to some extent. Firstly, time can be saved remarkably by using the Internet. In detail, instead of taking a great deal of time to deliver messages before the technological era, humans now can do this activity in a much shorter time via email. Secondly, communicating with others in long distance has been easier than ever. Nowadays, people can keep in touch with their relatives, their distant friends regardless of distance, boundary and time. For example, some students living oversea often fall sick with depression because of limited communication with their families in the past, but today they find it really easy to contact with others every day.
On the other hand, technology has brought to humans some hindrances. One of the most significant drawbacks would be that our face-to-face conversations have been considerably reduced. This can be seen frequently in various cafes when people avoid socializing to simply use their phones, they find it more interesting and comfortable by talking in virtual life rather than real life.
In conclusion, technology has been brought to us many major changes, these changes have affected people’s life both positively and negatively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47766323024 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18179286133 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1228311745 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.266666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224813848485 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100583499811 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112645451392 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143740798839 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321676386929 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.