These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time.
 Explain why you think this change has happened.
 What are the effects of this change in attitude?

It is true that people beer to dispose of broken materials instead to restore broken items and reusing them. There are various reason why is it happen in this way, and it is numerous of negative effects.

Here are the reasons why we behave in this way. Firstly, many companies in these days able to produce a great number of good products than in the past because of the development technology. For example, H&M or Zara, there can produce a thousand pieces of clothes per day, plus customers can buy items with low price. Secondly, Some people buy items for some purposes, as celebrities buy a dress to their children’s birthday. Finally, people buy new materials to represent that they are wealthy in their society, while some people obtain new items because they do not want to use the old items.

The most essential of this effect as health, people who work in the industries they have to work hard and sit for a long day, that can effect to their physical suffer such as back pain, muscle hurt and so forth, which they obtain low income. If people turn to repair the damaged items and reusing them, then it may support those people by working less and they have more leisure time for family and relaxing.

To draw a conclusion, there are several factors that have a cause of this trend, and this trend has directly effect to a person who is creating good quality products.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt technology. H&M or Zara, for example, there can produce a thousand pieces of c...
^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a celebrity' or simply 'celebrities'?
Suggestion: a celebrity; celebrities
... people buy items for some purposes, as a celebrities buy a dress to their children's bi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61693548387 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33731535187 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8934865488 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248604595057 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920934291221 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342096714165 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135350008391 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357363873047 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.