Topic: When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent you agree or disagree?
Presently, many advanced technologies have been developed to improve people life and maximize the productivity. Some people contend that the development of technologies has led to the end of traditional skills and lifestyle, whilst others think it is worth to preserve them. I can see the issue from both perspectives, however I consider the latter to be a stronger argument.
Those who state that there is no point to keep traditional skills and lifestyle believe that advance technologies outweigh traditional skills and change our lifestyle. Nowadays, machines are applied in all fields of production because they bring about higher productivity and more accuracy while it is limited to use manual labors and conventional method in production. Advance technologies also allow a wide range and a diversity of products. In addition, our lifestyle is currently formed by modern technological advances which save us time and bring about convenience. For example, most of us today use internet to communicate with each other, send emails, and purchase things instead of handwriting letters, going to market to buy what we need.
There may be some truth to the above argument, however preserving traditional skills and ways of life is of critical importance as tradition also means culture and history. All nations have their own traditional skills, which manifest their culture and history, have been maintained and developed from generation to generation. Japan is well-known both as a hi-tech country and a place where all traditions are valued and preserved such as wagashi (a traditional skill of making cake) and ceramic making. These traditional skills are Japanese prides and admired by people around the world.
Furthermore, another point in terms of this issue must be considered is that traditional skills and lifestyle serve as a basis to develop modern technologies. We can see that many machines are invented upon traditional skills. For example, embroider machine and sewing machine was based on conventional techniques.
While it is clear that there are sound rationales which support both sides of this argument, however I consider the assertion that the traditional skills and lifestyle goes along with development of technologies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41310541311 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00288414215 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0506225678 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165152961219 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550338934866 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472125058466 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923287544982 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336428557025 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.