the best way to solve the world's environment problem is to increase the cost of fuel. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
According to destruction of ecological balance on environment because of unregular fuel consumption, scholars are engaging to find a remedy to get rid of. Rising in fuel expenditure is one of most practical proposing, but I am not sure it would be the effective solution.
The first point to make that is, not only increasing the level of price and taxation should not be very impressive in this complex issue but in economical section the situation might be worse than ever. the prominent illustration have shown that after modifying the cost of ingredient exploited from oil, they have experienced a higher level of increasing in taxation, such as gasoline, petrol and electricity. However, this politic to some extent might be effective but society is exposed by another pressing problem that needs to much more dealing to tackle.
When we return to other point of view to make, there is argued that changing in fuel prices in not the only solution to cope with environmental issues. There is the responsibility of government and other conservative institutes to have an alternative scheme in order to reach the best compromise about global warming, deforestation, waste pollution, chemical poison and other contaminated against nature and environment. By and large, the most environmental disastrous are originated from all of this threatening factors.
In conclusion, however trough most people opinion the promotion in fuel price level should be a practical cure for environmental crisis, but I do not agree in this case, as a suggestion, there is an urgent need for society specially In educational section to deal with the level of awareness about the risk of pollution exposed by environment instead of higher taxation and price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the situation might be worse than ever. the prominent illustration have shown that ...
^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... by another pressing problem that needs to much more dealing to tackle. When we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22775800712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04947530803 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590747330961 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0967511124 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.222222222 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117621341475 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424540328645 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237994585337 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655372603096 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190848823635 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.