Children usually want to play the same games and watch the same TV programs as their friends. Should parents allow it or not? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.

The phenomenon of recently changing patterns of children toward streaming content & sports come to the forefront.
Some people believe that parents should restrict their children to play same sport and activities as their friends do. However, I agree with those who hold the notion that parents should give liberty to their children for selection of their games and the TV shows. In the following paragraph, I will explore the rationale for both the beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on the matter.

As for those who believe that parents should put a kibosh on their children activities towards sports and streaming content which their friends do, there exist valid reason the main justification is that they believe this will stop their children growth. And, they believe this will not let their children be a great leader in future. The Austin reported just last week children who copy the same activities of their friends, for some time it feels like great mind thinks alike, but after a certain point of time and they will not grow in their life.

Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion in good conscious. The fact is that by giving liberty to children on such issues let them fell that they are on the same cruise. The Harvard reported that Austrian children who have such freedom are more successful, as they participate in more competition and blow them away. The Harvard reported that initiative of Austrian citizen proved that this process will foster their children development.

In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that parents should stop their children from watching same tv shows and playing similar sports and pitches in, normal people like others and I can bring change. My aspiration is that soon people understand the process of children's development and give their contribution in a healthy way.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...lore the rationale for both the beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ot let their children be a great leader in future. The Austin reported just last week chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 318, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in more competition and blow them away. The Harvard reported that initiative of Aus...
^^^
Line 8, column 321, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...development and give their contribution in a healthy way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01294498382 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50565437564 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9345917706 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266200364264 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103303040749 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774230863299 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150418190017 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776280780194 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.