Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The number of languages on the planet has been decreasing for several decades and nowadays the process is speeding up. Many claim that the trend is harmless and the humankind will benefit on the long-run from it. I partly agree with the prospect and the reasons on which my stance is based will be discussed in details below.
Firstly, there are those who aver that the decline in the number of tongues will make life easier. The more people would be speaking the same language, the fewer problems with understanding each other would they face. To illustrate, if the mankind had been speaking only one language, artists, scientists, other people would have been able to exchange ideas without barriers. In this case, people would likely live in a world with fewer wars, less poverty and absence of terrorism. Thus, the trend may be useful for the humankind.
Secondly, the language extinction is not important because it signals about spreading of globalization that may be seen as a next step in the human race development. For instance, needless to say that advancement of contemporary technology has made the inhabitants of the planet more connected and intertwined with one another than ever before. For example, any person with access to the internet is able to converse with individuals who live on other continents and interacting is more convenient if both interlocutors use the same language. Thus, there is an objective necessity to understand each other and rare tongues that aren’t widespread are less valuable and thus, they will eventually become extinct. In other words, declining of languages spoken is natural process.
To sum up, there is no doubt that many languages will have died out by the middle of the XXI century. This trend appears to be a part of an evolution of the humanity that will eventually make life better.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Secondly, the language extinction is not important because it signals about spreading of globalization that may be seen as a next step in the human race development.
Description: The word signals is not usually used as a verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Suggestion: Refer to signals
needless to say that advancement of contemporary technology
needless to say that the advancement of contemporary technology
In other words, declining of languages spoken is natural process.
In other words, the declining of languages spoken is a natural process.
You have issues on article 'the'
flaws:
Better not partly agree/disagree, like:
I partly agree with the prospect...
so what is the content for 'the partly disagree'
Better 100% agree or 100% disagree, though we will discuss both sides.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1498 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.832 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.606 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.996 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.302 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.048 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
...nd nowadays the process is speeding up. Many claim that the trend is harmless and the huma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, no doubt, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01294498382 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69704163434 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4237720263 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243217548054 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077478473648 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480487501293 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148530106969 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371482754022 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.