It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Undoubtedly, Understanding the analogy between good and bad things are of significant importance in the child’ early stage of life. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, although arguments can also be made against the idea. In this essay, the debate will be discussed, and will be given a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the idea of penalty to children cite various benefits, it can bring to the children. Firstly, it can facilitate children to become fully-aware of the consequences which, it can bring to them, especially to the young children only if found indulged in unethical activities and immoral behaviour. Secondly, it helps to produce a radical change in the thinking power of the children by making them more disciplined and well-behaved. In addition to this, it can also enhance and improve their overall academic life. For instance, a study made by the IMF shows that 50% of the children who are disciplined achieve great success and better job as compared to the ones who are not.
On the other hand, opponents point out their view that often punishment produce negative effects on the children which can lead to the aggressive behaviour in the children. Furthermore, child becomes more reluctant and short-tempered because of the circumstances which they perceive hostile to them. Secondly, If the punishments were not done in a well-behaved and controlled environment, it can damage the relationship between guardians or teacher and children.
Overall, it seems reasonable to me that if penalty would be carried out under the supervision of either parents or teacher than it can help the children to understand the dissimilarity between good and bad activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...b as compared to the ones who are not. On the other hand, opponents point out t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24909747292 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07632917133 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.33792626 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138770808603 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516207429278 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214360499256 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803504756469 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182208904847 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.