It seems clear that obesity in today's society is to some extent due to the availability of fast food. Should governments place a tax on fast food to reduce the amount of fast food consumed?
Easy availability of junk food has increased the number of couch potatoes in many countries. Obesity has become a serious health concern for almost entire world wherein levying taxes on fast food is counted as a highly effective measure for the prevailing problem.However, I believe there are many other effective measures can be taken in order to curb the trend and to grow healthy society.
To begin with, fast foods are consumed by affluent class who never cares about the cost of the food. For example, visiting Mcdonald or Pizza Hut has become a status symbol nowadays. Needless to say, increase in taxes on this food will have a trivial effect on the consumption rate by the wealthy families. Moreover, there is another class of people like students and professionals, who are living away from their home and family, are eating this food due to its cheaper cost and easy access. Increase in the price of a handy food due to extra taxes may disturb their budget but not the consumption rate.
Conversely, Taking fewer effective measures in creating awareness about the chronical detrimental effects of fast food on the health can bear the fruits. To exemplify, driving an awareness camp in schools and colleges for guiding parents and students together about the consequences of unhealthy foods and suggesting healthy eating habits etc can serve the purpose. Finally, supplying subsidized and hygienic traditional food to the students and officials by institutions and organizations respectively can help in reversing the trend.
To sum up, fast food has been declared as a visible culprit behind an epidemic of obesity among citizens which can be obsolete only through supplying education and cultivating of healthy eating habits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...tive measure for the prevailing problem.However, I believe there are many other effecti...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not the consumption rate. Conversely, Taking fewer effective measures in creat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16961130742 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7610494335 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0441058794 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289946437368 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11522953342 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687598304262 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172970566972 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040294404099 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.