Living standards of urban areas are higher than rural areas. Give reasons why so and proposal for the solution?
Urbanization has surge the gap between rural and urban areas. As we can see, modern areas has a lion’s share in the population count also. People from small towns are migrating to developed cities in search of bread and butter. In this essay, I will discuss the cause and solution for the present situation.
To commence with, a standard of living is comprised of several factors like income, quality, affordability of housing, employment rate and so on. Urban localities provide these facilities at ease to a capable person. However, the counterparts living in rural areas face many problem to meet the both ends. Industrialization has attract a legion of people towards cities in search of work. In addition to this, better education and opportunities availability snatch the interest of people living in far-flung areas.
However on flip side, if we look at rural areas there are some locations where even basic needs are not fulfilled. There are several remedies for this issues. The first antidote to address the problem is that the government should came forward for the development of underdeveloped regions. Somehow public utilities like hospitals, parks, schools must be built in these places. Moreover to reduce the pressure on city infrastructure industries must be set up at countryside. Secondly, policies should be made to attract investor in rural areas by the means of natural resources abundance for that areas.
In a nutshell, rural areas must be developed to reduce the pressure on cities, otherwise the development of urban areas will lead to a lopsided development. If it is not addressed in stipulated time in near future developed areas will become overpopulated and will not be able to meet the demands of denizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'surged'.
Suggestion: surged
Urbanization has surge the gap between rural and urban areas. ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...on's share in the population count also. People from small towns are migrating ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
... To commence with, a standard of living is comprised of several factors like income, quality, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...counterparts living in rural areas face many problem to meet the both ends. Industrializatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'attracted'.
Suggestion: attracted
...et the both ends. Industrialization has attract a legion of people towards cities in se...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lfilled. There are several remedies for this issues. The first antidote to address t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... schools must be built in these places. Moreover to reduce the pressure on city infrastr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... in rural areas by the means of natural resources abundance for that areas. In a nutshel...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15492957746 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9388818254 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2583644366 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1176470588 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244590994977 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716219604862 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615310744803 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143156853525 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033061748298 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.