Nowadays airline providers more benefits to the rich, often achieving this by reducing areas used by the economy class to provide more comfort to1st class passengers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statements? Give your opinion.

Air travel has been merging with our travel activities for a few decades. With each iteration of the travel, we rely more on air travel. Some people feel that airline provides better services to the people travelling in premium class, but at the cost of a passenger travelling in an economy class. However, I agree with those who say that both the class enjoy their services according to what they pay, but not at each other cost. In this essay, I will examine both sides and give my opinion.

As for those who hold the notion that people travel on economy class get fewer services, there are many reasons. The most common one is the fewer leg space and moving area. For instance a person who travels on 14 hour flight, get fewer leg room make person exhausted. In addition to it on such flights they get less refreshments. Stanford publishes a report that reveal on a long air travel if a person get fewer nutrition food products and uncomfortable sitting person become more prone to cardiac problems.

Nevertheless, I firmly believe that opinion is ludicrous. The obvious reason is that airplane providers have to recover their cost by making arrangements for both the class. A New York university study reveals that airplane provider as they can't recover their entire travel cost from economy class, because people who travel in to the premium class they pay an arm and a leg. This same study reveals that because of the economy class people changed their way of travel.

To sum up, cheap air travel have changed the way of travel for economy class. I hope that people understand that they are getting the services without compromising the area used for them.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun refreshments is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...addition to it on such flights they get less refreshments. Stanford publishes a repo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...r arranged seats of both class, as they cant recover their entire travel cost from e...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85460992908 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3928498902 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4002598423 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184267876272 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663826750651 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472279454459 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116301928153 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627165727563 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.