The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

For us to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution the ownership of cars must be restricted to one per family. In this situation I do agree because it can lessen the traffic that we are experiencing right now. Also in this essay I will provide some benefits about it.

As I mentioned earlier I do agree that we must limit the cars in the world especially here in the Philippines. First, one of the reason why there is traffic congestion is for example in each family, all of the members has their own cars and if they go out all together with their own wheels, they will be added to the traffic on the road. Instead of riding all together in just one vehicle, that can help us to lessen the traffic. In addition to this, we all know that vehicles really has a big contribution in the pollution because they releases dark smokes that can harm peoples health as well as the environment.

Secondly, I do agree because with this rule, all of the people can have benefits to it. Workers without cars or the commuters can arrive to their work early same situation with students that needs to travel far. Also with this it can also decrease the road accidents that can be also added to the reason why there is a traffic.

In my conclusion, we really need to implement this order, so that it can be beneficial to all of us to decrease our travel time and also to lessen the reasons that harms peoples health.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...will provide some benefits about it. As I mentioned earlier I do agree that we ...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ngestion is for example in each family, all of the members has their own cars and if they ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'release'
Suggestion: release
...tribution in the pollution because they releases dark smokes that can harm peoples healt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...dly, I do agree because with this rule, all of the people can have benefits to it. Workers...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...with students that needs to travel far. Also with this it can also decrease the road...
^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'traffic'.
Suggestion: traffic
...e also added to the reason why there is a traffic. In my conclusion, we really need to...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43461538462 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42246329226 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484615384615 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5148013539 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.818181818 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200085166409 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914249675122 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101651925552 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139013287023 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936964145538 0.056905535591 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.