Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them danger. However, children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom.
To what extend do you agree or disagree ?
Parent and teachers are like god. They always try to ensure that children have good behavior and are always protected from any kind of danger. For achieving this, they tend to impose discipline and regulations upon children. I strongly believe that such a behavior of parents and teachers is only for the well being of the children.
Firstly, nowadays, crime rating is growing in the world and lot of children are often struck by human traffickers, kidnappers, drug dealers etc. These are some unforeseen dangers which causes lot of trouble to children and their parents. Therefore, in many cases, children have lost their lives or have been separated from their parents, for lifetime. To avoid such situations, parents and teachers remain proactive and conscious, educating children about different types of danger that exist for them. They are often educated not to talk to strangers, avoid eating anything from strangers and ensuring that they are back home before dusk. Consequently, confirming their safety.
In addition, parents and teachers are always aware that children are fragile in nature. How wise and intellectual children may be, they are always prone to adopt bad habits or companionship. As a result, they are always taught moral values from time to time. This act is just to make sure that they do not indulge in drugs, drinking, smoking etc and also avoid company of such children.
On the contrary, restrictions may lead them to become less social in life. At certain point, they may not be able to express themselves properly and may become impulsive , to accomplish what the desire to do.
To conclude, I firmly believe that rules and regulations are extremely important and are addressed to ensure safety of the children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...selves properly and may become impulsive , to accomplish what the desire to do. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, kind of, as a result, in many cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11846689895 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61832033365 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8839868887 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4117647059 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267020387418 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854382004685 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519264909909 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13966043309 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600412606966 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.