The world economy today is a complex juxtaposition of wealthier nations on one hand and not so wealthy on the other. An issue that has increasingly become popular in most societies is the development of the third world countries. Some people, to make it clearer, have claimed that the rich countries should share their wealth to help the poorer nations whereas others have maintained that the government of those poor nations should take initiative to change the fate of the nations. It appears to me several points to discuss about that problem.
Firstly, citizens of both poor nations and wealthy nations are human being. Therefore, the wealthy nations’ support to the poorer ones is essential which is not only connecting the World friendship but also creating original platform to develop. Besides, those sharing is the way to compensate for the damage which the rich countries made in the past wars.
In contract, there are people who believe that poorer nations should solve their own problems. When they can stand on their feet, they have an autonomy about their rights such as economy, military, political … in the world. Further, this is a duty of the party in power which makes people believe their government more and more. In addition to this, the paying’s people various types of taxes to the government and studying modern technology skills from wealthy countries are plentiful powers to help government to look after their citizens themselves.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that skill some circle of people do not agree with own view and able to justify these points. However, I firmly believe with the help of part of the wealthy nations, the needy countries can solve problem by themselves and they can also grow in same manner as the rich countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The world economy today is a complex jux...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints to discuss about that problem. Firstly, citizens of both poor nations a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich countries made in the past wars. In contract, there are people who believ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook after their citizens themselves. In conclusion, there is no doubt that sk...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, third, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03020134228 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55859885266 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560402684564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.243516849 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340855649545 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111646932647 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100612234341 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191542486871 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962018198567 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.