Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.

Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Traditionally, children begin studying foreign languages at secondary school. Many individual schools or educationalists have recommended to study foreign languages at an earlier stage. However, this policy may bring some advantages along with some disadvantages. 
Obviously young children pick up languages much more easily than teenagers. Their brains are programmed to learn their mother tongue which also facilitates learning another language. At a young age, children are enthusiastic to explore and to learn new things. In Primary education subjects are more shorter and students will be more free that can maintain their enthusiasm and progress. Acquiring foreign languages in the early ages can also help them to understand other cultures also they can utilize it for exploring more details which are written in that foreign language.
However, there are some disadvantages. Primary school teachers may not have the necessary language skills or they are not well trained for that languages. Most of them will be only concentrated in generalised subjects. Language experts can make the sessions will be more flexible. Mostly it will become more stressful for students to learn more than one language including their mother tongue in the primary schooling. Some researchers shown that the children have difficulties in deciding which language to speak may end up learn nothing.
In conclusion, A standard policy can be adopted at primary schools which can also benefit society culturally and economically. Young children's grasping power can make these benefits more achievable.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vantages along with some disadvantages.  Obviously young children pick up languag...
^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'shorter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: shorter
...ings. In Primary education subjects are more shorter and students will be more free that can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h are written in that foreign language. However, there are some disadvantages. P...
^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uage to speak may end up learn nothing. In conclusion, A standard policy can be ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66108786611 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02661177638 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573221757322 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3195482558 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6428571429 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313583248953 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116256157709 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989055829601 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203115730906 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993884615341 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.