Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are many people say that earth has been impacted negatively by people themselves. And others claim, it was improved by human who live on it. So here, i will exlain in details about the two perspectives.
First of all, there are enormous number of people have misused recources of earth. In addition, they parcticd passive actions on lands. For examlpe, human are used to go through deforestation. As they cut trees for mutilple purposes. However, there is group of go green community has presented reports as an evidence that air pollution was brought by human's actions. Whereas, people invented cars work on fossil fuel. Moreover, cars would produce carbon dioxide which it comes out from exhausts. Although people have problems with air breathness, they still use consistantly. There are so many immatures were dead due to this effect. As their bodies are weak, they are unbale to resist diseases, which it is caused by cars' emission.
On the contrary, there are huge number of people working on improving ecosystem on earth. For example, go green community people, they create system to conserve nature from being polluted. As they persist to keep people aware of passive actions, which it to destroy life on earth. In addtition, they have created programs to increase awareness while using earth's resources. Besides, they try to educate people about using renewable resources as an alternative features. So they can play important role to encourage human on using it. As they can enlighten them about going throug renewable resources instead of fossil fuel to function cars. As a results the percentage of immature's death will be decreased dramatically. Ailments might be vansihed slowly. Furthermore, deforestation will be slightly taken off. Animals will be protected also from extinction, as we know animal can be extincted due to deforestation which animal depend on.
To conclude, people can use renewable resources to save life from being destroyed by human inactivities towards earth. So non renewable recources are not the only rescorces that human can depend on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...roved by human who live on it. So here, i will exlain in details about the two pe...
^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ollution was brought by humans actions. Whereas, people invented cars work on fossil fu...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 535, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt role to encourage human on using it. As they can enlighten them about going thr...
^^
Line 6, column 642, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nstead of fossil fuel to function cars. As a results the percentage of immatures d...
^^
Line 6, column 645, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...ead of fossil fuel to function cars. As a results the percentage of immatures death will ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21068249258 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71787087775 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581602373887 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2730941901 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.5384615385 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9615384615 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88461538462 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187110012885 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552461849403 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496297194501 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13736328285 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273693090238 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.