Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The wide range of punishments for various crimes has always posed a heated controversy as whether to attribute certain punishments for certain crimes or decide the type of punishment per case.
Regarding the unique nature and life condition of each and every man, this can leave the judges and the justice systems with a heavy burden on their shoulders. I, personally believe that there must be a framework to refer to, while the frame cannot be too strict as to reject any possibility out of it.
Each nation and civilization has long strived to provide their citizens with a justice system to react to crimes in order to give society the benefit of peace and order. Numerous laws and legislations passed by expert law makers aim at preventing chaos and subjectivism in a justice system. “An eye for an eye” reflects the time-honored attitude towards clarity of punishments which seems a comfort to many victims as well as leading to a lower chance of getting away with a wrongdoing.
Human nature, however, tends to defy any strict frameworks as well as generalizations. Hundreds of crimes are committed on daily basis facing judges and juries with inevitable dilemmas to reach a verdict. In regards to punishments. Hardly has it always been easy for a judge to come up with a verdict which is certain and free from doubts. Shooting a drunk driver who has run down your innocent six-year old daughter at a moment of crisis cannot be easy to judge. Bending laws seems unavoidable at certain times to mitigate the agonies of the victims in certain cases. Sticking to the unchangeable rules, thus, would definitely sound either insane or unimaginably cruel.
Considering the above facts and the tremendous challenges of making a just decision on punishments and hence people’s lives, it’s only rational to have the fairest possible law system which is open to bending at times only by the most trusted and just experts in order to bring order and comfort to a society simultaneously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...inevitable dilemmas to reach a verdict. In regards to punishments. Hardly has it always been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
...n regards to punishments. Hardly has it always been easy for a judge to come up with a verd...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00297619048 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82323474185 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0560627021 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189280630375 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539337755939 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06506021277 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108171133976 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757568025866 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.