Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the
number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect
on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people argue that increasing sports centres are the ideal way to improve public health, whereas others would argue that this would have minimal impact on public health and that other plans are needed. This essay will argue that although increasing sports centre could provide easy access and encourage people to take up exercise seriously, controlling fast food and high sugar content foods are essential to improve public health.
Developing leisure centre and providing affordable fitness services could increase public health. Many people are joining a gym due to high cost if the facilities have increased no doubt that demand will drop and sports centre can provide the service in cheap rate. For example, As per the recent article in Indian express heart diseases had come down by 75% after many sports centres are opened in major cities across India.
To improve a health of the public hazardous food product such as fast food and fuzzy drinking should be heavily taxed.These products are causing enormous health issues such as obesity and diabetes. The price increase may reduce the consumption. For example, United Kingdom has recently imposed sugar takes on the soft drinks which significantly reduced demand.
To conclude. Motivating people to exercise by developing sports centre will assist to improve public health, however, intake of heavy fat food must be controlled to have a good health. It predicted that improving awareness about high-fat food could improve public health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... fuzzy drinking should be heavily taxed.These products are causing enormous health is...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30543933054 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34782099845 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594142259414 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.899999373 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30148081179 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119868226486 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107238395766 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196592574858 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945894105286 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.