The argument whether government should not put money on building theatres and sport or whether government should spend more money on medical care and education is stilled not yet settled. This notion merit serious consideration with many people claiming that government should spend more on theatres and sport. Ultimately, I think is better for government to spend more on medical care and education. I will explain why with pertinent argument and examples.
There are myriad of argument in favor of my stance the most conspicuous one is the advantages associated with spending more on medical care and education. Spending more on medical care and education reduces es the level of wait to see a general practitioner or the wait to undergo surgery. Scientist has proof that cancer can be treated if detected on time. Although, the increasing level of patient with cancer is alarming with eighty percent not aware of having the disease. For instance, underpinning the aforementioned an empirical part of a survey conducted shows that people are afraid of waiting for long to be check and tested for any illness or disease.
Another pivotal aspect in favor of my argument is that education open doors for skilled workers, better opportunities and less illiterate in the society. This shows that if more is spend on education more people will be educated. And if more people are educated disease can be control as a result of awareness.
On the other hand sport and theatres offers entertainment and relaxation of the body and soul after a busy day. Scientist has also proof that work without play is death. For instance to prevent cardiovascular disease it is important to partake in one form of sport or the other. To clarify to reduced not having dementia the need of been socially active have a role to play. This include going to the theatres with friends.
I believed that government should spend more on medical care and education to reduce the level of wait to see general practitioner and to undergo surgery. Nevertheless, the benefit of sports and theatres should not be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'merits'.
Suggestion: merits
...is stilled not yet settled. This notion merit serious consideration with many people ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on medical care and education reduces es the level of wait to see a general pract...
^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cer can be treated if detected on time. Although, the increasing level of patient with c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and tested for any illness or disease. Another pivotal aspect in favor of my ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...the society. This shows that if more is spend on education more people will be educat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, i think, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99713467049 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7517399003 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472779369628 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1838739849 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7894736842 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330075243436 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102657197089 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122514953902 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198838108841 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157163103057 0.056905535591 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.