Some people think the air travel should be restricted because it causes environment pollution. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples.

Essay topics:

Some people think the air travel should be restricted because it causes environment pollution. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples.

Reducing the effects of air pollution has been in the headline for decades. Some feel that individual people and their actions will not have an effect on climate change. However, I agree with those who say that everyone has a responsibility to save the environment. In this essay, I will examine both sides and give my opinion.

Regarding those who feel individual behavior does not affect environment pollution, there are many reasons. The most common one is that the problem of climate change is simply too vast to be effective on such a small level. For example, one person restrict his/her air travel is not going to save the world. Secondly, people point out that other forms of transport, impact our environment much more than aircraft. Stanford published a study in 2015 that found a cars in Asia, produced more Co2 in one day than a Boeing/Airbus could create in a one year.

Nevertheless, I firmly believe that opinion is ludicrous. The obvious reason is that every little bit helps, and the actions of many individuals added together can assuredly stop environment pollution. For instance university of Oxford published a study that said that every aircraft which travel on five days a week for one year saved at least 20,000 pounds of Co2 from being released in to the atmosphere. This same study also said that if 200 people together choose to take the electric form of transport instead of a gasoline enable enabled vehicle, as much as 100,000 pounds of Co2 will not be emitted.

In sum, if everyone pitches in, normal people like you and me can, indeed save our word from the threat of global warming. I hope that, soon, each and everyone of us does our part to save the environment.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...examine both sides and give my opinion. Regarding those who feel individual beha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., one person restrict his/her air travel is not going to save the world. Secondl...
^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing/Airbus could create in a one year. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that opin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...crous. The obvious reason is that every little bit helps, and the actions of many individu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to take the electric form of transport instead of a gasoline enable enabled veh...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e threat of global warming. I hope that, soon, each and everyone of us does our p...
^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... does our part to save the environment.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, at least, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78644067797 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5854430846 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8908692692 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15700259229 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496061807722 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267319205018 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862447943008 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288918221289 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.