Some people think Governments should take measures regarding the healthy lifestyle of individuals. Others think it must be managed by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion

There is a global controversy surrounding the issue of communities health throughout the world in this era. Some people assert that government should take the burden of making people’s way of living healthy. In contrast, others hold the diverse view and persistently claim that it is the mere responsibilities of individuals to deal with this issue. To me the idea of former party seems more appealing, although government should provide the ground for this problem.

On the one hand, it is widely said by sociologist that government plays an immense role with respect to provision of basis of readily health acquisition in the people’s life. So, they should properly take advantage of their authority and pass the laws that trigger the popularization of sanitary and sports in their territories. For example, the heads of the countries in the X country gave consent to establishment of sport TV channel in 2016. Subsequently, the survey manifestly that sport has become more prevalent.

On the other hand, in favor of the second group, the healthy lifestyle should be solely carry out by people. Not only should they maintain an air of healthiness in the community, but they ought to think of boost to this issue. For instance personal hygiene is an immense problem that should be managed by people themselves. As a matter of the fact, this is a crisis among inhabitants in some needy country in Africa. However, it is very pessimistic view to have a hope that individuals could handle this issue without the sake of government no matter where they are living.

To sum up, in my personal view, it would be distinctively wise is people and government have efficient co-operation regarding creation of healthy life. Last but not least, there is a hope that in the close perspective no one suffers from scarce of health and sanitary issue all over this planet.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...ve consent to establishment of sport TV channel in 2016. Subsequently, the survey manif...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, second, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00638977636 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90836621577 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555910543131 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0613613355 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.466666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196273812274 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621403096185 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601478858775 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111863183178 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492466215051 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.