In the past people normally write letters to friends who live in a remote place, which is expensive and time-consuming. With the advant of Internet, the world appears smaller than before because Internet makes communication easier. I utterly agree that the Internet provides a cheap and time saving means for people to communicate with each other.
First of all, Internet charges less than other means of communication. A call or message costs consumers merely a few cents; whereas, a letter normally requires several dollars for envelop and stamp. Communication via Internet is so costless that a majority of people who have effortless access to it mainly use phone calls, short messages and e-mails to communicate with others. This is not the only advantage of utlizing Internet for communication.
Besides, another advantage of communication via Internet is time saving. A phone call can reach the contact instantly. If the contact is not available at the monent, a short message notifies him at the earliest convenience. In addition, e-mail is becoming a formal way to contact people, replacing the custom of sending a letter because of its advantage of time saving. Generally, a letter takes around one week to reach the receiver; however, an e-mail arrives at the receiver's mailbox instantly after a click of send button. Thus, Internet makes communication with other people easier the before.
To summarize, the advantages of cheap prize and time saving make Internet an easier way to communicate. People nowadays rely on Internet to communicate in almost every occasion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'receivers'' or 'receiver's'?
Suggestion: receivers'; receiver's
...iver; however, an e-mail arrives at the receivers mailbox instantly after a click of send...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, thus, whereas, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29249011858 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91018625194 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3766714011 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356358726753 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132280432193 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125457827165 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241445340716 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828191136532 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.