Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree with these views?
In the contemporary world, adverts play a crucial role as a practical instrument to inform all customers of information about incoming products. However, a number of sales of merchandise merely illustrate the role of advertising instead of whether those goods fulfil the real needs of the society. I agree with the view in some circumstances.
It is reasonable to believe that the high sales of goods are attributable to the overwhelming power of various commercials. Generally, to promote products, most companies have a tendency to provide customers with an exaggerated account of the commodities’ quality, which can seduce a growing number of people into purchasing those unnecessary items. For instance, many people are likely to buy a MacBook Pro which is prohibitively expensive but unable to meet the requirements of most gamers. This is because customers are misled by the claims of adverts.
On the other hand, some people also argue that a myriad of sales can represent the needs of modern society. A variety of goods, including daily necessities, which are not universally merchandised using a series of adverts are still sold out quickly. As an illustration, dairy products are tremendously in a demand since such products have great implications for individuals’ growing process.
To conclude with my opinion, it is worth mentioning that the high sales of particular goods are due to the fact that adverts gives an exaggerated description of the products’ quality and popularity. However, other essential items people tend to stock up on still can reflect the needs of society.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
due to the fact that adverts gives an exaggerated description
due to the fact that adverts give exaggerated descriptions
Sentence: However, a number of sales of merchandise merely illustrate the role of advertising instead of whether those goods fulfil the real needs of the society.
Error: fulfil Suggestion: fulfill
Sentence: For instance, many people are likely to buy a MacBook Pro which is prohibitively expensive but unable to meet the requirements of most gamers.
Error: gamers Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Words: 255 350 //It is very important to put more content to get higher marks.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 255 350
No. of Characters: 1306 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.996 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.122 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.988 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.084 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.417 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.569 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.019 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...still can reflect the needs of society.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34117647059 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25522323007 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1139673367 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190966294243 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695941827664 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602499364393 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110562695549 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322976552313 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.