Agree or disagree?
Should a city try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them and replace them with the modern buildings?
At the turn of the new century, in modern societies, with the development of humans’ modern society more and more people tend to flourish their cities. As a matter of fact, to satisfy such a need they need to establish new building such as factories, company, and so on. Therefore, they prefer destroy these building and constructing new building for developing their cities. Although some people agree with this functional, I believe that the society needs to preserve their historical building because of preserving culture and attracting tourist.
First and foremost, maintaining culture is a significant advantage of being historic building. It goes without saying that every nation has its own custom which presents the culture of it. In fact, as far as I am concerned that every person depends to a culture and he should get familiar with culture of his antecedents because it can help the person views life from a different perspective. A prominent psychologist in my country claims that when children can find their personality and their goals in their life that they aware of their cultures and customs. As a result, preserving old and tradition construction in a society leave profound impacts on its people’s lives.
Another subtle point is that, attracting tourist can be considering another impact of preserving old building. It is crystal-clear that, nowadays one of the most important ways for flourishing a country is assimilating tourist because they can bring prospers to society. According to recent research done by archeologists in my country conducted that exiting old building can boom economical conditional with the present of people who are belong other countries. For example, I live in a historic city that there are a lot of old buildings such as palaces, gardens, museums, and so on. Every year a large number of tourists enter to my city for visiting these building. In fact, they spend lots of money for entering these building and buy traditional handicrafts, so they can cause develop in this city. Hence, what has made old building so valuable is the vast range of attracting tourist.
In a nutshell, it is obvious that the modern society has gone through some changes by the enormous impact of tending to modernism. Although constructing new buildings can help prosper a nation, destroy old buildings is not a good solution. In fact, how people who live in a modern society can familiar with their culture in the past? How young people can cognize of their personality? How can a city attract new tourist? Undoubtedly, answers all of these question are conserving old building.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... conditional with the present of people who are belong other countries. For example, I ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...onal with the present of people who are belong other countries. For example, I live in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gardens, museums, and so on. Every year a large number of tourists enter to my city for visiting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238095238095 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.153209109731 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101449275362 0.0866891130778 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0186335403727 0.046263068375 40% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0621118012422 0.0685040099705 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149068322981 0.118717715034 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0517598343685 0.0351676179071 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88292749374 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0186335403727 0.0309702414327 60% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0890269151139 0.0887237588012 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0227743271222 0.0209618222197 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0165631469979 0.0139019557991 119% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2638.0 2387.08602151 111% => OK
No of words: 431.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12064965197 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38283062645 0.338922669872 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322505800464 0.251872472559 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222737819026 0.174417080927 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132250580046 0.112833075102 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88292749374 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494199535963 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.1864041164 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5909090909 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0655971408 48.84282405 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 120.699889404 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5909090909 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 0.644075263715 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 51.8414891373 45.7405998639 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.87610619469 1.45489161554 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209455823891 0.300154397459 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106198516734 0.103427244359 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0596546877876 0.0752933317313 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.453342770587 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0944497028193 0.151897553556 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800157482788 0.114077575197 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375985671762 0.0781384742642 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365932179575 0.336927656856 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0243980072816 0.067059652881 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153540646875 0.210909579961 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349183604468 0.0618886996521 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.