Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that education has an important role in the societies. Universities, as a vital part of education complex, should provide the suitable condition for students to achieve best results. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that it is not proper for the student to devote time for unnecessary basic courses which are not related to their major. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, waste of time and energy and the existence of many required courses in the students’ field of study could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding of the limitation of time and energy of students in the universities, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires of sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that advocating time for some courses, which students do not need in their studies, is waste of the time. As the famous Persian proverb says that “ time is the gold”, they could use this precious time for doing some useful activities. Furthermore, the population of students in each major is high and this enhances the number of students in the basic science classes. Thus, the efficiency of the class will be reduced and teachers could not show their best performance. For instance, in a large class, when students talk to each other, other students become distracted; moreover, the control of these classes is an exhausting duty.
In addition to the reason raised above; the important required courses in faculties could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with students belief, the period of each semester is very short and they could not allocate sufficient time for each required course. Thus, they could not do the best and their grade will be unsatisfied. The universities could increase the time of these classes by omitting some unrelated basic courses in each major. Indeed, the student could concentrate their focus on the important courses and they could gain better results. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students unveiled the fact that about 45 percent of the regular students time should be used for doing the assignment of the basic science courses. This study shows that by eliminating some unimportant basic courses, the student could use their time for important required courses and universities give better-educated students to the societies.
Drawing upon of the above reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that universities should eliminate some unnecessary basic courses. Not only it could prevent the loss of time and energy of students but also it gives some positive results in some required courses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1185770751 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85023268119 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3126182863 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204555073329 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723072002183 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048691487929 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132090341693 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043796554339 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.