In recently years, with the development of intellectual economics, human resources have been playing an increasingly vital role in a company’s economic performance. From my perspective, however, the argument that improving employees’ skills is the most important investment for a company seems over-emphasized.
Admittedly, enhancing employees' abilities is conducive to a company's growth. After several training courses, green hands are less likely to commit blunders and are apt to excel in his/her area quickly. Experienced workers get to know the new trend of businesses and adjust their work accordingly. Meanwhile, employees may also be intrinsically motivated as they consider their job as a rewarding and meaningful one. However, from another perspective, if companies fail to retain the skillful-trained workers, they are spending money fostering talents for their competitors. More money allocated to train workers, less money left for salaries and bonus, which attributes to resignment. To some extent, it is essential to raise salaries to keep talents and encourage workers’ self-improvement.
In addition, it is more important, as least not less, to invest in advanced technology and equipment. Technology becomes more and more important under the era of Big Data. Apple, Microsoft or Google all invest a huge amount of money on VR or Artificial Intelligence. Companies are not schools. They are to sell products or services to make profits. Technology, served as a core competitiveness, guarantee the continuing revenue and prosperous prospect. For example, HUAWEI developed their own chips and became one of the most successful companies in China. Google, based on years of innovation, master in big data analysis technology, providing the abundance of products such as google maps or google research. Without core technology, companies can only copy and imitating, which cannot have a loyal customer base and be competitive in the market.
Moreover, the investment in recruitment, especially for the higher position also plays an important role for a big company. With different people working in different capacities, it's easy for a group to fall out of touch and not realize how their work might be interacting with other people's efforts. Effective leadership can help guide the direction of a group. Also, a nearly inevitable component of group work is interpersonal conflict. A good leader will be able to step in when necessary to mediate interpersonal conflict, serving as an objective force pushing parties to some form of compromise or reconciliation. Training makes for competent workers, leadership makes competent workers coordinate with each other and producing better performance.
Taking all the factors discussed above into consideration, many other investments for a big company are indispensable and the one to improve the efficiency and proficiency of its employees is just one of those important aspects, but not the most important one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60352422907 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29977414122 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583700440529 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1693014274 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.76 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.16 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17775034459 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446359688191 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580712039804 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115909678611 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643240882082 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 86.8835125448 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.