Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Social media is a good way to express personal views.
With the marked growing size of media and the well-developed information technology, social media are raising their influence among the public. Indeed, the information on social media is so wide spread that millions of people are informed at the first time. That’s why some persons who wants their view presented to pubic rely on the social media. However, exposing personal views to pubic may lead to severe consequence, so it is better to think twice.
First of all, expression personal views on social media will bring you a lot of audiences, including somebodies that dislike you. The reasons why they are against you vary from opposing your idea to just simply trying to annoy you. It is true that you always have a group of people who object to you, but the way they display their disagreement can be terrible in such an open environment while they can hide their identities. Instead of debating with you, they may directly make personal abuse to you, which caused a huge pressure. Because of the existence of those people, presenting personal idea on social media may not be a good choice.
In addition, you are fully responsible to whatever you said on social media. Since you are observed by people all over the world through social media when expressing your idea, it is hard to deny your words. In order to overcome others’ query, your idea is supposed to be highly logical and convincing, which is not an easy task. Besides, some kinds of personal views that are not suitable for presenting on social media, for example, the dissatisfaction with some policies or opinions that are not “politically correct”, once being stated on pubic, can cause severe criticism or even makes you be punished by laws. So your personal views is limited by social media.
What’s more, your opinion may even be changed by the editors of those social media to draw the public attention, which not only makes you unable to present your own view, but also will cause unnecessary trouble on you because a hot topic is always controversial. For example, a writer wrote a report about that we should take our efforts to help children who cannot afford the school fee. The newspaper stressed a small part of the report in which the writer mention that the government still needs more effort on those children, and made the report seem like mainly complaining about the authorities. Then readers were surprised at the report and went to buy the newspaper to read the details, while few people realized that they should take actions to help those children. The existence of those media without virtue increases the risk of depending on social media.
To sum it all, it is obvious that social media is far from a good way for presenting your personal opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...rsons who wants their view presented to pubic rely on the social media. However, expo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...ia. However, exposing personal views to pubic may lead to severe consequence, so it i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...lly correct', once being stated on pubic, can cause severe criticism or even mak...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, may, so, still, then, well, while, for example, in addition, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88771186441 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62464259342 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4738579884 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.35 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288944395239 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10946444876 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739497322245 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189460482383 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628074433033 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.