Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Depending on personal experience and personality type, people might have different opinions about this subject. Someone prefer to have common relation with people and being alone in their work time, but others have a negative attitude toward it. As far as I am concerned, I agree that having the ability to relate well to people is vital to be successful in the life especially in the job because of several reasons including getting better opportunities and being calm to be successful in the job.

Finding new and good chances in the job is the first reason of current discussion. In this regard, it should be noted that having a good relation with people has a good impact on our life and sometimes it changes our goals. For instance, my friend worked in a company as a driver. He was a funny man and always have good relation with people. Because of the close relation with his colleague in that company, he learned how to use the computer software. In addition, he was popular among the co-workers and boss of the company because of his good behavior. After a while, the boss agreed that he could be a computer engineer in that company and thus he got more income. On the other hand, there was a tough person in that company who was a clever student in university. But, he was anxious and treated awfully with others in the company and thus he never improve in his job position. Therefore, one of the most considerable reasons to having ability well to people is about getting good opportunities in the job.

Another noteworthy reason of ongoing discussion is being calm and happy by relating well to people. In this case, it sounds logical to say that having good communication with other helps us to be happier than the time which is alone and having no contact with people. In other words, a person who want to be alone usually is not popular among people. Imagine, a person who works in a big sports club. By having a good relation with different news sources and interviewers, he will be named as a good co-worker in that club among people and thus can be improved in his job position by being calm and doing his work well. Conversely, presume a person who has a good academic background and has no ability to relate well with medias. So, he is always angry and can not focus on his work and thus will be hired from his job. Consequently, by having the ability to relate well to people, we can be relaxed and concentrate on work to be successful in our job.

In conclusion, the ability to relate well to people not only helps us to acquire more opportunities in jobs but also helps us to be calmed and relaxed to focus on our job. Finally, it is better to have this point in mind that studying hard in school beside of ability to relate well to people can guaranty our success in the life.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...nt opinions about this subject. Someone prefer to have common relation with people and...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 856, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'improves'.
Suggestion: improves
...others in the company and thus he never improve in his job position. Therefore, one of ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52259332024 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.507057904 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41257367387 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6022826731 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.086956522 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1304347826 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21739130435 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216048067718 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754127418269 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587397732757 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165512751702 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044215065469 0.0645574589148 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.