Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, everything is becoming more complicated than before. With improving technology, people's general awareness is increasing. It is crucial to for young people to have the ability to plan in this intricate world. Even though some psychologists disapprove of this strategy, but, as for me, I would like to support the former idea. There are two main reasons why I feel this way, which are going to be elaborated on in the following essay.
In the first place, it is transparent that future depends on people's present-day performance. If younger people have the capability to plan for their future, they will make the odds against failure high, in the future, as a wise person once said, "The more you try now, the more success you would have in the future." With respect to the psychology research, as a case in point, accomplished in the University of British Columbia on June 5, 2009, it can be distinctly understood that, in the Victoria, 89 percent of people, who had somewhat better planning abilities, are more prosperous in their life and satisfied of their life dreams' status in comparison with whom have not excellent planning capabilities. Thus, it is significant to plans for future.
There is also the fact that planning abilities raise people's social personality. In other words, the more you can plan and lead, the higher level of personality you would have. So, other people tend to respect you more than the past. An experience in my own life can be an appropriate example to illustrate this. In my first days at University, I did not have high dignity as I have now, due to the fact that people were not familiar with my personality. But, after a year, when they saw my great management and planning capabilities, they completely altered their behavior. What's more, my older brother, John, who is a psychology associate professor at the University of Calgary, is always telling me that had he a second chance to come back to his childhood, he would definitely proceed on learning innovative ways of planning. Therefore, social abilities are indispensable for high level of dignity.
So what are we to conclude? If taking into account all the factors mentioned in the article, is not it crystal clear that it is important for young people to have those abilities? Notwithstanding some other psychologists' opinion insisting on to be disapproved of with this strategy, it is more likely for the former point of view to be of more value. And I, personally, as a graduate student of psychology, approve of that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays world, everything is becoming ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elaborated on in the following essay. In the first place, it is transparent th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is significant to plans for future. There is also the fact that planning abi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...they completely altered their behavior. Whats more, my older brother, John, who is a ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dispensable for high level of dignity. So what are we to conclude? If taking in...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'psychologists'' or 'psychologist's'?
Suggestion: psychologists'; psychologist's
...e abilities? Notwithstanding some other psychologists opinion insisting on to be disapproved ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as for', 'i feel', 'in other words', 'with respect to', 'in the first place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.199596774194 0.229887763892 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.147177419355 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100806451613 0.0866891130778 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0504032258065 0.046263068375 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.070564516129 0.0685040099705 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135080645161 0.118717715034 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0302419354839 0.0351676179071 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.907826715 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0342741935484 0.0309702414327 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0786290322581 0.0887237588012 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0161290322581 0.0209618222197 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0141129032258 0.0139019557991 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2566.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 431.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9535962877 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329466357309 0.338922669872 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.262180974478 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185614849188 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.15313225058 0.112833075102 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.907826715 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54060324826 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 62.8110723279 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.55 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 124.51562151 48.84282405 255% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 128.3 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.65 0.644075263715 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 47.7680974478 45.7405998639 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.36090225564 1.45489161554 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372251321747 0.300154397459 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.093593584275 0.103427244359 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0673808240688 0.0752933317313 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.433324539927 0.497263757937 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180012263357 0.151897553556 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141297948114 0.114077575197 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954645264805 0.0781384742642 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.400527989492 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0400360179807 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28532673643 0.210909579961 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031101287027 0.0618886996521 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.