Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, by progressing the technology, accessing to information about a different subject is easier than before. We have different media such as Internet, Tv, Radio and etc in the world that are momentous sources of news. But, the crucial point is about the reality and accuracy of news in these media. As far as I am concerned, I agree that when a person wants to be well-informed, he might get information from many different news resources because this method decreases the risk of errors in the news and it helps the person to be more skilled on informing.
Limiting the risk of errors is the first reason of current discussion. In this regard, it should be noted that having information from many resources is better than having information from one resource because of the misleading. In other words, one resource may have a wrong information about a specific news and it will have a negative impact on a person who gets information from just that resource. On the other hand, if a person gets information from different resources, the errors of information will be limited or eliminated because it never happens that many resources have wrong information. For instance, my brother like to have information on time and thus he use different media to access the news information. One day, his friend talked to him about the soccer game and my brother corrected his error in the result of a game because he knew that result from different resources instead of one resource. So, eliminating the fault is the most substantial reason that a person might get information from many different resources.
Another noteworthy reason is about focusing on the news. In this case, it sounds logical to say that if we spend more time on an issue, we will reach a better opinion about that issue and thus will get a better result. It works in getting information too. It means if we spend the time on different news resources, we will focus on news better than before and thus be more sophisticated in informing. Imagine a person that get information from one resource. This person only has general information about the news with no detail. Conversely, presume a person who gets information from many news media. This one has a lot of information with details that help him to talk about the news for a while. Thus, being skilled on informing is another reason that person should get information from different media.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally reach the conclusion that getting information from different news not only decreasing the risk of a fault in news but also helps the person to be more skilled on informing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...informed, he might get information from many different news resources because this method decr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...to have information on time and thus he use different media to access the news info...
^^^
Line 3, column 1015, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...hat a person might get information from many different resources. Another noteworthy reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84547461369 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74059654205 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395143487859 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4111628508 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.523809524 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329860347398 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133275784754 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822910944815 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23343426352 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269959311744 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.