Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which rapid changes and diverse complexities become an integral part of it, it is not far-fetched to presume that the cars plays crucial role in these alterations. However, whether this change inclined to be decreased or increased in terms of the numbers of cars is considered as a contentious issue. There are growing segment of people who contend that within 20 years from now, the human being will not necessitate this much automobiles. I personally concur with this idea. In the ensuing paragraphs, the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, there is a substantial drop in population growth rate. There is no denying to the fact that one of the principal reasons for increasing the numbers of vehicles is the people utilizing them. Therefore, the smaller the population is, the less car people need. According to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rudd, a prominent and highly respected professor in Department of Demography at the Macquarie University, population growth has slowed dramatically. His research revealed that peak population growth rate was reached in twentieth century by 5% and it has now increased of just 1%. Subsequently, this probe provides further legitimacy for the idea the world will witness the monumental reduction in employing the cars.
Another crucial point which should be taken into consideration is the fast pace of technology development. Nowadays, there is a plethora of factors leads to unprecedented progressive in diverse technologies. Indeed, both advanced sciences and increasingly number of users have embolden the scientists to seek for new innovations. For instance, if a person takes a brief look at the history of transport, the great extent of changes throughout these years will immediately catch his attention. Indeed, so various is the types of transportation that no one 50 years ago could have envision that human will experience space travel in 1967. Undoubtedly, this incredible amount of development within only half of a century bears witness to unimaginable future creations will be occurring 20 years later. Needless to say that after the advent of wide array of new facilities, people will opt to use them instead of riding the old-fashion cars.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that the numbers of cars will be fewer. In fact, the next-20-year people not only will not decline their population, but also they will not be incline to use outdated automobile due to their new advanced options.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'segments'?
Suggestion: segments
... a contentious issue. There are growing segment of people who contend that within 20 ye...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...e human being will not necessitate this much automobiles. I personally concur with t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s statement will be further elaborated. First and foremost, there is a substanti...
^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'emboldened'.
Suggestion: emboldened
...s and increasingly number of users have embolden the scientists to seek for new innovati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'envisioned'.
Suggestion: envisioned
...ion that no one 50 years ago could have envision that human will experience space travel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18138424821 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98643080866 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587112171838 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6233492852 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.55 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.95 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16877765456 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482186537253 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432578081677 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110299740602 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562929893167 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.