Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

From a broad perspective, in the cuurent astate of affaris we face, in which the complexities of todays' world put on new demands on the societies, it is not far-fetched to presume that the interaction amonge people is remarkably affected. However, whether these alterations in communication alleviate or aggravate the statuse of human in its community is considred as a contentious issue. There is a grwoing segment of people who contend this idea that individuals do not allocate sufficient time to care their societies. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the cost of living is increasingly steeped. Thre is no denying the fatc that so busy are people with their job that no time left for allocating() to their favorable deeds. In metroplises, people work at least ten hourse a day to scrap a living. According to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highlt respected professor in the Department of Economy at University of Macqurie, the numbers of people living under poverty line has increased drstically. His research revealed that the peak destitution rate was reached in Oct 2016 by 18% and it has surged by 8% in camparison the the last year. This probe provide further legitiamcy to this idea that many of people has no other choice but spending virtually all of their time and effort to make their living. Undoubtedly, in this circumstance, having found their families in jeopardy, citizens do not make a point of assisting the rest of the community's members.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is the public perspective regarding the governmental supports from required() people. Needless to say aside from a regretful financial statuse, people benefit from a wide array of governmental suport throughtout the world from financial to psychological. Indeed, as individuals become certian() that the official centers faciliate the situation for whom require special treatment and care. Consequently, they merely get involved in activities associated with helping the communities. Whereas, these people would have more happy and hopeful if they recieved the public attention and affection.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that people do not spend adequate time to their societies. This issue occur not only due to they are enaged with the matter which have more priorities for them, but laso since they count on supports which may recieve from their governors.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...% and it has surged by 8% in camparison the the last year. This probe provide further l...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...% and it has surged by 8% in camparison the the last year. This probe provide further l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overnmental suport throughtout the world from financial to psychological. Indeed,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, whereas, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18644067797 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92030163232 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8320875252 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177067856421 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053521731822 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514843910478 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106503211437 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271846334346 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.