Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently?
Nowadays, children’s education is of the greatest importance in a great many countries. Whether parents help their children doing their school works or not, that is the question. Although a substantial number of people strongly believe that children require their parents’ help for doing home works, personally speaking I take the issue with this widespread belief. I strongly claim that parents should encourage their children do their work independently owning to its advantages. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraph.
First, should parents encourage their children do their work independently, children will benefit more from the lasting impression of the encouragement. It is crystal-clear that being independent is a key to success. In my reckoning, not only do children get accustom to do their assignment alone, but also they would learn how to do other duties with no assistance. To pave the way for this example, I would like to give an example of my own experiences. Never had my mother helped my with my home works when I was in elementary school, but she had always encouraged me to do my best by describing the possible results of doing our best in schools. Hence, the more children encourage to do independently in school, the more they would become independent in the future.
Second, proponent favoring encouragement over helping contend that parents would benefit from this encouragement too. It goes without saying that in this hectic life which humankind are living, anybody has to accomplish monumental amount of works every day, parents in particular. In my view, should children be able to do their school works themselves, parents would not have to donate a significant amount of their time for this duty too. Deeming, a mother who work both work out of home and in the home has to dedicate a part of her time for helping their children do their assignment, would she have enough time for spending to herself? Simply put, a parent by learning their children to do their assignment rather than assists them in doing would free up some time for her personal works such as reading book, exercising, watching book, to name it but a few. In a words, having encouraged their children, parents would shrink their heavy workload.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points and details, I firmly agree that it is much more beneficial for children to receive encouragement from their parents for doing their home works rather than direct help inasmuch as it will bode well for them in the future since they would learn how to do other things independently. Besides, parents do not have to try to sacrifice their time any longer in order to help them. Then, why not accept the fact that having enthusiastic to be independent, children would benefit both in school time and future?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 685, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...ols. Hence, the more children encourage to do independently in school, the more they ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 867, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a word' or simply 'words'?
Suggestion: a word; words
...watching book, to name it but a few. In a words, having encouraged their children, pare...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, thus, well, as to, in particular, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03164556962 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86065136149 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485232067511 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.830615695 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.587553079912 0.236089414692 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222767614694 0.076458572812 291% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162755234571 0.0737576698707 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.429519581488 0.150856017488 285% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641877194077 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.