Do you agree or disagree with this sentence? the teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
The question is whether teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays or not. In my vantage point, this belief is approximately valid maybe because of accessing to resource faster and easier than past. My arguments and reasons are listed below that will strengthen my point of view:
First of all, since in the past being teacher had a high state, all society were relying to teachers; hence teachers were responsible in front of people and were trying to obtain more information from among huge massive of books. Conversely, these days the teachers do not have that high position as past, therefore young generation do not feel such a responsibility toward society. Young teachers believe that it is not their task to add the new things to children. They prefer to evaluate student's homework and answer their questions.
Second, nowadays there are more resources than past. People are able to access the newest data through media like radio, television, and internet and so on. Every one imagines that has a high quality of knowledge, consequently they have become selfish. Students view themselves more superior than their teacher and their aim from being in the class is show- off.
Third, in some countries conditions for jobs are different. For instance, in my country when a plight of job saturates in society, it gradually will decrease and even more it can lose. This circumstance will affect on income of those jobs. In a country like Iran that is a third world, diseases have been dominance on society, subsequently being doctor will be worthwhile for people more than other jobs. As a result Students do not incline to become a teacher and it goes without saying that this job will not be valuable for people.
As I have illustrated, I strongly assert this sentence and believe that this problem has created because of improving technology among people and also changing personality and viewpoint of people.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
therefore young generation do not feel
therefore young generations do not feel
being teacher had a high state,
being a teacher had a high state,
obtain more information from among huge massive of books.
obtain more information from massive of books.
Every one imagines that has a high quality of knowledge,
Every one imagines that he has a high quality of knowledge,
have been dominance on society,
have been dominant on the society,
because of improving technology among people
because of improved technologies among people
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
What doesn't it mean: it gradually will decrease and even more it can lose. ?
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 329 350
No. of Characters: 1595 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.259 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.848 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.555 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.562 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.891 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.3 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.3 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.036 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...ecome selfish. Students view themselves more superior than their teacher and their aim from being ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ore it can lose. This circumstance will affect on income of those jobs. In a country like...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'while', 'for instance', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245856353591 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.162983425414 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0745856353591 0.0866891130778 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0662983425414 0.046263068375 143% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0497237569061 0.0685040099705 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14364640884 0.118717715034 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0414364640884 0.0351676179071 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61171174496 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220994475138 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0745856353591 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0165745856354 0.0209618222197 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00828729281768 0.0139019557991 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1962.0 2387.08602151 82% => OK
No of words: 329.0 408.028673835 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96352583587 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358662613982 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261398176292 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182370820669 0.174417080927 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103343465046 0.112833075102 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61171174496 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 62.3173774838 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5625 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.89972178 48.84282405 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 120.699889404 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 46.7023176292 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.54455445545 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366727268794 0.300154397459 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101664611138 0.103427244359 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0695310004757 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.510763804502 0.497263757937 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163935304518 0.151897553556 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13031210609 0.114077575197 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13440497079 0.0781384742642 172% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.223304993702 0.336927656856 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.044587420572 0.067059652881 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21693345753 0.210909579961 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106086937234 0.0618886996521 171% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.