The government should spend their money on arts rather than on sports.

Essay topics:

The government should spend their money on arts rather than on sports.

Art is one kind of creativity in which huge activities people can do. Whereas, sports are things in which people engage in playing number of games. In my country value of arts and sports are equal, But if the question about supporting any one thing, definitely I support the artworks and suggest that government give financial aid on arts rather than on sports for following reasons.
To begin with, lots of people support the sports. In fact, many celebrities and wealthy people funding on the sportsmen but no one can fund for arts. That is first reason that government should spend money on arts, so people realize that art is also given happiness. Many people share their feeling through painting. I would like to share many things which reveal that arts have equal important as sports. For an example, last year, I went heritage museum in Goa. I really enjoyed little children work. The children age only five to seven years but they made designer pots and decorated many things, there also made a natural painting in which one painting I took a picture it is really amazing and reveals strong emotion. A darkest shade show pain of animal painted in painting. The museum cave pots, painting, and other decorative object are excellent and I think that the children painting put on the international exhibition, so everyone sees the little children talents.
Furthermore, traditional and heritage culture depicts on the arts. Plentiful artwork needs to preservation and repair; therefore, arts need financial support. It is government responsibilities to preserve and take arts in the museum, so everyone see that and understand our culture and ancestor works. In addition, it helps to attract tourist to see the culture artworks, ultimately, increase the value of places and helps to the economy of place.
Moreover, the government supports help to those people who are talented in artworks. Many people have skill but they need one stage to reveal their skill in front of the world. For an instance, my friend has no hand but still, he painted huge painting on his leg, he teaches painting to other people. He has also right to show his talents in front of the world. The government should organize the art competition in national as well as international level so, as like my friend, a number of other talented people show their skill and earn money. As government support for sports game such as cricket, this game is famous in my country, as cricket government should provide fund for arts.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, supporting the art work not only for cultural and heritage work preservation but also for talented people who have to need the stage to perform and show their work. That is the reasons for I agree with the statement that government should give financial help to artwork rather than to sports.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...in which huge activities people can do. Whereas, sports are things in which people enga...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 724, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...lly amazing and reveals strong emotion. A darkest shade show pain of animal paint...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, i think, in addition, in brief, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93555093555 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61909873149 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471933471933 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6985268443 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.96 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.24 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.96 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263059014268 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686104602729 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087664826184 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14547366982 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469889758379 0.0645574589148 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.